Outcomes of COVID-19 amongst patients with ongoing use of inhaled corticosteroids - a systematic review & meta-analysis. [Review]

MedStar author(s):
Citation: Infezioni in Medicina. 31(4):440-448, 2023.PMID: 38075428Institution: MedStar Washington Hospital CenterDepartment: Pulmonary/Critical Care FellowshipForm of publication: Journal ArticleMedline article type(s): Journal Article | ReviewYear: 2023ISSN:
  • 1124-9390
Name of journal: Le infezioni in medicinaAbstract: Background: WHO quoted the numbers for the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic as of August 2021 were 200 million cases with over 4 million deaths globally. COVID-19 is associated with several respiratory pathologies. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are used to improve lung function by reducing inflammation, edema, mucus secretion, and inhibiting various cytokine activities. However, there is limited data on the effect of ICS usage in patients with COVID-19. In this study, we aim to evaluate the association between the use of ICS and the outcomes in COVID-19 patients compared to standard COVID-19 treatment.Conclusion: ICS is associated with increased mortality and risk for hospitalization in patients with COVID-19 as compared to standard non-steroid-based COVID-19 therapy. It is crucial for healthcare providers to carefully evaluate the potential risks and benefits of ICS usage in the context of COVID-19 management to optimize patient outcomes and safety.Methods: We followed PRISMA guidelines and MOOSE protocol for conducting the systematic review and meta-analysis comparing ICS and standard COVID-19 therapy. A search on PubMed is conducted yielding 270 articles of which 6 manuscripts are finalized for inclusion in the study. Patients with COVID-19 are identified from the studies based on confirmed positive RT-PCR tests. Hospitalization, ICU admission, and mortality are selected as the outcomes of our study. Using RevMan 5.3, we performed random-effects models to estimate the pooled effect size (pooled odds ratio), 95% confidence interval (95% CI), and heterogeneity (I2). Forest plots are obtained and p <0.05 is considered statistically significant.Results: Our study involves the comparison of ICS vs Non-ICS for mortality (N= 207,842 vs 166,217), ICU hospitalization (N= 1,084 vs 9,425), and the risk of hospitalization (N= 1,273 vs 1,676). Of the six studies, five reported mortality. We found a higher mortality rate in patients with asthma (60.88%, 107/160) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (68.46%, 382/558) among ICS users. The overall mortality is 7.49% (107/1428). We found that ICS use was associated with higher odds of mortality (OR=1.45 95%CI: 1.10-1.91; p=0.009, I2= 68%) amongst COVID-19 patients. In subgroup analysis, higher odds of mortality among COPD patients using ICS was noted [pooled OR: 1.52 (1.24-1.86); p<0.0001; I2=0%]. However, no significant association between ICS and mortality was observed among asthma patients.All authors: Mahmood SN, Shah V, Patel U, Nawaz MU, Akula NV, Balan I, Manivannan D, Pleshkova Y, Negit S, Desai P, Jaiswal R, Gurram N, Patel N, Tirupathi R, Koritala TFiscal year: FY2024Digital Object Identifier: Date added to catalog: 2024-01-16
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode
Journal Article MedStar Authors Catalog Article 38075428 Available 38075428

Background: WHO quoted the numbers for the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic as of August 2021 were 200 million cases with over 4 million deaths globally. COVID-19 is associated with several respiratory pathologies. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are used to improve lung function by reducing inflammation, edema, mucus secretion, and inhibiting various cytokine activities. However, there is limited data on the effect of ICS usage in patients with COVID-19. In this study, we aim to evaluate the association between the use of ICS and the outcomes in COVID-19 patients compared to standard COVID-19 treatment.

Conclusion: ICS is associated with increased mortality and risk for hospitalization in patients with COVID-19 as compared to standard non-steroid-based COVID-19 therapy. It is crucial for healthcare providers to carefully evaluate the potential risks and benefits of ICS usage in the context of COVID-19 management to optimize patient outcomes and safety.

Methods: We followed PRISMA guidelines and MOOSE protocol for conducting the systematic review and meta-analysis comparing ICS and standard COVID-19 therapy. A search on PubMed is conducted yielding 270 articles of which 6 manuscripts are finalized for inclusion in the study. Patients with COVID-19 are identified from the studies based on confirmed positive RT-PCR tests. Hospitalization, ICU admission, and mortality are selected as the outcomes of our study. Using RevMan 5.3, we performed random-effects models to estimate the pooled effect size (pooled odds ratio), 95% confidence interval (95% CI), and heterogeneity (I2). Forest plots are obtained and p <0.05 is considered statistically significant.

Results: Our study involves the comparison of ICS vs Non-ICS for mortality (N= 207,842 vs 166,217), ICU hospitalization (N= 1,084 vs 9,425), and the risk of hospitalization (N= 1,273 vs 1,676). Of the six studies, five reported mortality. We found a higher mortality rate in patients with asthma (60.88%, 107/160) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (68.46%, 382/558) among ICS users. The overall mortality is 7.49% (107/1428). We found that ICS use was associated with higher odds of mortality (OR=1.45 95%CI: 1.10-1.91; p=0.009, I2= 68%) amongst COVID-19 patients. In subgroup analysis, higher odds of mortality among COPD patients using ICS was noted [pooled OR: 1.52 (1.24-1.86); p<0.0001; I2=0%]. However, no significant association between ICS and mortality was observed among asthma patients.

English

Powered by Koha