Cheating the Rules of Admission With "Observation".

MedStar author(s):
Citation: AMA Journal of Ethics. 25(12):E901-908, 2023 Dec 01.PMID: 38085993Institution: MedStar Washington Hospital CenterDepartment: Emergency Medicine Health Policy Research FellowshipForm of publication: Journal ArticleMedline article type(s): Journal ArticleSubject headings: *Hospitalization | *Medicare | Aged | Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. | Costs and Cost Analysis | Hospitals | Humans | United StatesYear: 2023Name of journal: AMA journal of ethicsAbstract: When physicians admit patients to a hospital, their decisions about where-and to whose professional stewardship and services-those patients belong are influenced by federal policies, of which many clinicians are not aware. The distinction between observation and admission has clinical and ethical implications for patients and practices. The evolution of "observation status" from a clinical tool to a catchall of vague and imprecise meaning has been driven by changes to physician payment and compensation structures, particularly Current Procedural Terminology codes and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services regulations, and its current value to clinicians and patients is questionable. This article contextualizes clinicians' admission and observation practices and considers how metrics influence patient costs and how clinicians and organizations are compensated. Copyright 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.All authors: Haselden L, Rahman SFiscal year: FY2024Digital Object Identifier: Date added to catalog: 2024-01-16
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode
Journal Article MedStar Authors Catalog Article 38085993 Available 38085993

When physicians admit patients to a hospital, their decisions about where-and to whose professional stewardship and services-those patients belong are influenced by federal policies, of which many clinicians are not aware. The distinction between observation and admission has clinical and ethical implications for patients and practices. The evolution of "observation status" from a clinical tool to a catchall of vague and imprecise meaning has been driven by changes to physician payment and compensation structures, particularly Current Procedural Terminology codes and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services regulations, and its current value to clinicians and patients is questionable. This article contextualizes clinicians' admission and observation practices and considers how metrics influence patient costs and how clinicians and organizations are compensated. Copyright 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.

English

Powered by Koha