000 04674nam a22009017a 4500
008 190521s20192019 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022 _a1878-0938
024 _a10.1016/j.carrev.2019.02.015 [doi]
024 _aS1553-8389(19)30148-4 [pii]
040 _aOvid MEDLINE(R)
099 _a31079816
245 _aTranscatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis and Prior External Chest Radiation.
251 _aCardiovascular Revascularization Medicine. 20(5):376-380, 2019 05.
252 _aCardiovasc Revasc Med. 20(5):376-380, 2019 05.
252 _zCardiovasc Revasc Med. 20(5):376-380, 2019 May.
253 _aCardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions
260 _c2019
260 _fFY2019
265 _sppublish
266 _d2019-05-21
268 _aCardiovascular Revascularization Medicine. 20(5):376-380, 2019 May.
501 _aAvailable in print through MWHC library: 2002 - present
520 _aBACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) and prior chest radiation is associated with poor outcomes in comparison with patients without prior radiation. Our objective was to compare clinical outcomes of patients with and without prior chest radiation undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for symptomatic severe AS.
520 _aCONCLUSIONS: Thus, TAVR appears to be a safe treatment option in the short and medium term for patients with symptomatic severe AS and prior chest radiation.
520 _aCopyright (c) 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.
520 _aMETHODS/MATERIALS: Between January 2003 and January 2017, 1150 patients underwent TAVR at our institution. Of these, 44 had prior chest radiation. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, procedural details, and clinical outcomes were prospectively collected.
520 _aRESULTS: Patients with prior chest radiation were younger, 76+/-13years, compared with those without prior chest radiation, 82+/-8years (p=0.002). Median Society of Thoracic Surgeons score for chest radiation patients was 7+/-4, compared to 8+/-5 in those without prior radiation. Despite higher prevalence of complete heart block, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups with regard to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation. There was a trend toward longer length of intensive care unit stay in chest radiation patients, but there was no significant difference in 30-day or 1-year mortality.
546 _aEnglish
650 _a*Aortic Valve Stenosis/su [Surgery]
650 _a*Aortic Valve/su [Surgery]
650 _a*Cancer Survivors
650 _a*Thorax/re [Radiation Effects]
650 _a*Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
650 _aAged
650 _aAged, 80 and over
650 _aAortic Valve Stenosis/dg [Diagnostic Imaging]
650 _aAortic Valve Stenosis/mo [Mortality]
650 _aAortic Valve Stenosis/pp [Physiopathology]
650 _aAortic Valve/dg [Diagnostic Imaging]
650 _aAortic Valve/pp [Physiopathology]
650 _aDistrict of Columbia/ep [Epidemiology]
650 _aFemale
650 _aHeart Block/ep [Epidemiology]
650 _aHeart Block/th [Therapy]
650 _aHemodynamics
650 _aHumans
650 _aLength of Stay
650 _aMale
650 _aMiddle Aged
650 _aPrevalence
650 _aProspective Studies
650 _aRadiotherapy
650 _aRisk Factors
650 _aSeverity of Illness Index
650 _aTime Factors
650 _aTranscatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/ae [Adverse Effects]
650 _aTranscatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/mo [Mortality]
650 _aTreatment Outcome
651 _aMedStar Heart & Vascular Institute
657 _aJournal Article
700 _aAttaran, Saina
700 _aBen-Dor, Itsik
700 _aBuchanan, Kyle
700 _aGajanana, Deepakraj
700 _aIantorno, Micaela
700 _aKolm, Paul
700 _aOkubagzi, Petros
700 _aRogers, Toby
700 _aSatler, Lowell F
700 _aThourani, Vinod H
700 _aTorguson, Rebecca
700 _aWaksman, Ron
700 _aWeintraub, William S
700 _aZhang, Cheng
790 _aAttaran S, Ben-Dor I, Buchanan KD, Gajanana D, Iantorno M, Kolm P, Okubagzi PG, Rogers T, Satler LF, Thourani VH, Torguson R, Waksman R, Weintraub WS, Zhang C
856 _uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2019.02.015
_zhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2019.02.015
942 _cART
_dArticle
999 _c4239
_d4239